Leaping Over the Intelligence – Decision Gap

We all know, intuitively, that competitive
intelligence isn’t really intelligence unless it is actionable.
If a piece of intelligence doesn’t compel a decision-
maker to take action, we are told, it is just another piece
of information. But what constitutes action? And,
what is the process by which competitive intelligence
prompts a decision or strategy that is implemented and
subsequently managed? Frequently, even companies
that possess world-class competitive intelligence
functions struggle with turning credible, insightful,
actionable intelligence into a clear strategy, decision, or
course of action.

Why is good intelligence often not incorporated into
strategic plans or operational decisions? The problem, I
believe, rests with reluctance among management to
clearly define the role it expects intelligence to play in
company decision-making, to define key decision
components that are influenced by intelligence, and to
track progress against them.

Too often, strategic planning is an exercise in
reaffirming what is known or comfortable, or what has
worked in the past. Similarly, decision implementation
is often an exercise in executing what has worked
before. Companies are hard-pressed to take new, bold,
and decisive action even when all the intelligence
“signals” point to the wisdom of pursuing a new course
of action.

The identification of an issue champion can help. This is an
individual in a decision-making or leadership role whose corporate
function is most impacted by the intelligence. For the
issue champion to successfully act on new intelligence,
the CI manager must brief him or her on the content of
the intelligence, and discuss the implications for the
company and for his or her function directly.

What other solutions can help to mitigate the gap between intelligence and action?