Thursday, November 6, 2008

Competitive Intelligence Driving More Corporate Decisions

It's a classic good news / bad news report: more US corporations are using competitive intelligence to drive critical strategic and tactical decisions than ever before, but an alarming number of companies still do not have structured way to deliver intelligence to decision-makers in their organizations. Is the chasm between companies that value CI and those that don’t growing?

Outward Insights conducted its second “Ostriches and Eagles” CI best practices survey, which gauges the effectiveness and use of CI among US companies across industries. The first survey was conducted in 2005. The biggest finding this time around? More and more companies are “getting” the value of competitive intelligence. Most reassuring was the growth among respondents who said that CI was “an integral part of operational or tactical decisions” over the 2005 survey.

Another positive finding was the 72% of respondents that claimed to use CI to “anticipate and thwart competitor strategies” compared with 64% in 2005. This uptick reflects the increasing value executives place in the early warning applications of competitive intelligence.
Among other key findings:

  • More respondents (28%) integrate likely competitor reactions into their plans for launching new products than in 2005 (21%)
  • The use of scenario planning nearly doubled from 30% in 2005 to 59% this year
  • The percentage of respondents who believe CI is “an integral part of the strategic planning process” was at 85%, the same as in 2005.
Despite these findings, obstacles still impede corporations from realizing the full value of competitive intelligence. For example, the survey found that nearly half of respondents say that their CI programs are not sufficiently funded. In addition, 37% of respondents said that CI does not have “sufficient stature” within their organizations. The gains that are evident in the strategic application of CI may be short-lived if these programs are not funded adequately and given proper stature in the organization. The survey also found that almost one in five executives believes that senior managers do not value the competitive intelligence they receive, and 24% of respondents said that their companies lack a formal CI process altogether.

There were some notable differences in the responses from the seven industry groups surveyed: consumer products, energy, financial services, insurance, high-tech, manufacturing, and pharmaceuticals. For example, consumer products companies were least likely to have an organized intelligence function (62% vs. 76% of all respondents), while energy companies were least likely to make CI an integral part of their strategic planning process (71% vs 85% of all respondents).

We conducted the survey in June and July 2008. The survey consisted of telephone interviews with 100 senior executives at US corporations. More than two-thirds of the companies participating had revenues of $1 billion or greater. To request a complete survey report, contact us at info@outwardinsights.com.

3 comments:

Alan S Michaels said...

Thank you Ken and Outward Insights for providing this summary information regarding CI and making corporate decisions.

The 85% of respondents who believe CI is an integral part of the strategic planning process is a very high number, it would be interesting to know if that includes those who believe it should be the case and/or those who include non-formal ad-hoc CI processes.

For the 2/3 of the companies that have revenues more than $1 billion, it would be interesting to know if their formal CI processes are at the corporate level, the group level, the line of business level, or some combination.

Thanks again for sharing your results.

Alan Michaels, President, Cheers,
Alan S. Michaels

Co-founder
www.eCompetitors.com

Ken_at_OI said...

Alan - Appreciate the comments. I'd guess that while 85% of our survey respondents believe CI is integral to strategic planning, few are doing it on a consistent basis. The majority, I'm sure, almost certainly include informal, one-off CI inputs into their strategy development process, doubtless with limited effectiveness.

As for CI process organization, these days its all over the map. One trend we've observed is a move away from the centralized single CI function to more distributed models that place multiple CI teams close to key decision-making points in marketing, product development, business unit leadership, etc.

Cheers,

Outward Insights

Anonymous said...

Interesting article as for me. It would be great to read a bit more concerning this theme. Thanx for sharing that material.
Sexy Lady
Busty London escorts